Embracing new green bond guidelines: The market for “green lemons”

26 May 2020

Dr Arthur KrebbersHead of Sustainable Finance, Corporates

View bio

Other insights

View more insights

2 minute read

It’s understandable that some corporate green bond issuers have felt in the past like a “Green Santa Claus” – desperately trying to meet the wish lists of a multitude of ESG stakeholders, while not always feeling duly compensated for their work.

Better pricing through external verifications

This is starting to change. With the mainstreaming of this market the financial and reputational benefits of a “well structured” green bond are rising. Recent research shows that green bonds with an external review trade on average 6 basis points tighter than those without such verification, which tend to trade in line with conventional bonds. In addition, green bonds with verification from the Climate Bonds Initiative typically achieved, on average, a price improvement of 15 basis points (Hyun et al, 2020).

Guiding principles help to spot the lemons and pick the peaches

Such intra-market distinctions are likely to become more pronounced. Rather like the economist Akerlof’s “market for lemons”, new and trusted guidelines help investors distinguish between high quality green bonds (“peaches”) and less impactful ones (“lemons”).

Such guiding principles could come from various sources:

Institutions: such as the EU Green Bond Standards, or regulatory authorities setting green bond prospectus requirements
Listing authorities: designated sustainable / green bond listing requirements
Leading investors: publishing their own guidelines for green bonds
Digital innovations: such as the blockchain-powered Green Asset Wallet platform for green bond impact reporting
Index providers: dedicated green bond indices with clear inclusion criteria

While it may sometimes seem like a cacophony, these market agents all have a key role to play in further improving the credibility (and hence attractiveness) of the asset class.

References:

Hyun, S.; Park, D. and Tian, S., 2020. “The price of going green: the role of greenness in green bond markets.” Accounting and Finance 60, 73-95
Akerlof, G.A., 1970. “The Market for "Lemons": Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism”. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 83, 488-500

ESG/Sustainability

Green bonds

This document has been prepared for information purposes only, does not constitute an analysis of all potentially material issues and is subject to change at any time without prior notice. NatWest Markets does not undertake to update you of such changes. It is indicative only and is not binding. Other than as indicated, this document has been prepared on the basis of publicly available information believed to be reliable but no representation, warranty, undertaking or assurance of any kind, express or implied, is made as to the adequacy, accuracy, completeness or reasonableness of the information contained in this document, nor does NatWest Markets accept any obligation to any recipient to update or correct any information contained herein. Views expressed herein are not intended to be and should not be viewed as advice or as a personal recommendation. The views expressed herein may not be objective or independent of the interests of the authors or other NatWest Markets trading desks, who may be active participants in the markets, investments or strategies referred to in this document. NatWest Markets will not act and has not acted as your legal, tax, regulatory, accounting or investment adviser; nor does NatWest Markets owe any fiduciary duties to you in connection with this, and/or any related transaction and no reliance may be placed on NatWest Markets for investment advice or recommendations of any sort. You should make your own independent evaluation of the relevance and adequacy of the information contained in this document and any issues that are of concern to you.

This document does not constitute an offer to buy or sell, or a solicitation of an offer to buy or sell any investment, nor does it constitute an offer to provide any products or services that are capable of acceptance to form a contract. NatWest Markets and each of its respective affiliates accepts no liability whatsoever for any direct, indirect or consequential losses (in contract, tort or otherwise) arising from the use of this material or reliance on the information contained herein. However this shall not restrict, exclude or limit any duty or liability to any person under any applicable laws or regulations of any jurisdiction which may not be lawfully disclaimed.

NatWest Markets Plc. Incorporated and registered in Scotland No. 90312 with limited liability. Registered Office: 36 St Andrew Square, Edinburgh EH2 2YB. Authorised by the Prudential Regulation Authority and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority and Prudential Regulation Authority. NatWest Markets N.V. is incorporated with limited liability in the Netherlands, authorised and regulated by De Nederlandsche Bank and the Autoriteit Financiële Markten. It has its seat at Amsterdam, the Netherlands, and is registered in the Commercial Register under number 33002587. Registered Office: Claude Debussylaan 94, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. Branch Reg No. in England BR001029. NatWest Markets Plc is, in certain jurisdictions, an authorised agent of NatWest Markets N.V. and NatWest Markets N.V. is, in certain jurisdictions, an authorised agent of NatWest Markets Plc. NatWest Markets Securities Japan Limited [Kanto Financial Bureau (Kin-sho) No. 202] is authorised and regulated by the Japan Financial Services Agency. Securities business in the United States is conducted through NatWest Markets Securities Inc., a FINRA registered broker-dealer (http://www.finra.org), a SIPC member (www.sipc.org) and a wholly owned indirect subsidiary of NatWest Markets Plc.

Related insights

ESG/SustainabilityWhat’s up with ESG ratings? Better access to the capital markets, that’s what.

Dr Arthur Krebbers, explains why companies should consider their Environmental, Social and Governance profile as a core part of…

ESG/SustainabilitySound governance is the springboard for positive environmental and social impact

Governance is the key to ESG success. The “E” and “S” hold little sway with investors if they are not supported by robust “G” measures.

ESG/SustainabilityStructuring a sustainable use-of-proceeds debt instrument

With investors, customers, regulators and the wider public – sensitised by treaties such as the Paris Agreement or the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) - increasingly expecting companies to align their business model and practices with environmental, social and governance (ESG) criteria, companies are acknowledging that change is in the air and that their sustainability journey will entail a series of projects which will require funding – capital that can, if done correctly, be more easily raised from ESG investors and is often more competitively priced in the sustainable finance markets.