ESG trends: what corporates should look out for in 2021

03 December 2020

Dr Arthur KrebbersHead of Sustainable Finance, Corporates

View bio

Other insights

View more insights

Arthur Krebbers, Head of Sustainable Finance for Corporates, and Varun Sarda, Head of ESG Advisory, set out what they believe are likely to be the major corporate trends in the world of ESG in 2021.

The 2020 coronavirus pandemic has heightened awareness of the importance of sustainability, which has served to accelerate the move towards ESG. Corporate treasury teams are increasingly expected to be comfortable in navigating sustainability standards and investor requirements.

The momentum behind these will continue to grow in 2021, as we set out in our macro market outlook. What are the key changes for companies we expect next year?

It’s well known that for many years, companies and investors have had to navigate a range of different sustainability reporting frameworks, standards and surveys – commonly referred to as the ESG “alphabet soup” because of all the acronyms involved.

To combat this, standard-setters have been working together to harmonise ESG disclosure requirements. In 2019, for example, the Corporate Reporting Dialogue launched the Better Alignment Project, a collaboration between the Carbon Disclosure Project (CDP), a charity that runs a global disclosure system for environmental impacts, the Climate Disclosure Standards Board (CDSB), the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI), the International Integrated Reporting Council (IIRC), and the Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (SASB) to drive better alignment of sustainability reporting frameworks.

In 2020, the SASB and the GRI announced a new collaboration to “help stakeholders better understand how the standards may be used concurrently”. During the year we also saw the World Economic Forum release a consultation paper entitled Toward Common Metrics and Consistent Reporting of Sustainable Value Creation. The paper, developed in collaboration with the ‘Big 4’ accounting firms and drawing on some of the standards we referred to above, proposes two related sets of ESG metrics, and is likely to help standardise ESG reporting across sectors.

We’ve also seen increasing efforts by regulators to encourage companies to report on their climate risk exposures. Most notably, the UK has announced its ambition to make disclosures aligned with the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) mandatory across the economy by 2025, with most of the requirements in place by 2023.

As pressure grows on companies to report on their material sustainability and climate-related financial risks, there’s also a clear need to ensure that their reporting is consistent. We believe standards will continue to converge, and that we’ll also see greater demand from stakeholders for better and more transparent sustainability disclosures.

A new product on the “sustainable debt” market, a sustainability-linked bond is a non-earmarked standard bond issue whose financing cost may be increased in the event of failure to achieve a sustainable performance objective. This target approach (as opposed to a project-based approach) aims at transitioning the entire capital structure of the issuer and can provide an attractive alternative to traditional use-of-proceeds instruments.

While sustainability-linked debt issuance has already moved into the mainstream in the loan markets (since the Loan Market Association released its Green Loan Principles in 2019), the bond markets have treated the concept of sustainability with a degree of caution. However, two developments in 2020 have opened the door to increased issuance of sustainable bonds:

  • The publication of the International Capital Market Association’s (ICMA) Sustainability-Linked Bond Principles in June
  • The announcement by the European Central Bank in September that as of 1 January 2021, sustainable bonds will be eligible instruments for its repo, monetary easing and other operations.

We expect the corporate sustainability-linked bond market to grow in the same “S-shaped” form as the corporate green bond market did in its formative years (2014–18). While there will be issuance from all major economic sectors, we’re likely to see overrepresentation from:

  • More carbon-intensive sectors (such as oil & gas, steel, mining) that want to avoid being accused of “greenwashing” with a use-of-proceeds instrument
  • Opex-driven industries (such as consumer and retail) that believe issuing sustainability-linked bonds represents a more credible way of demonstrating their commitment to sustainability than, say, a traditional use-of-proceeds bond or a sustainable-sourcing use-of-proceeds bond
  • Small companies that lack sufficiently large projects/assets for a use-of-proceeds structure

While it would be premature to view sustainability-linked bonds as a fully-fledged asset class, 2021 will see a continuation of the debate about some of their important characteristics – including the number of KPIs, coupon step-up margin, and the use of coupon step-up proceeds.

When it comes to ESG, with climate at the top of many agendas, the “E” tends to take centre stage. This has resulted in certain sectors, particularly those closely linked with environmental sustainability, being able to take advantage of investor appetite for ESG-aligned investments. A good example is power generation, as investing in renewable energy has a significant, tangible impact on reducing carbon emissions, and neatly aligns with ICMA’s guidelines for green-labelled issuance.

Recently, however, we’ve seen a broadening of investors’ interest in ESG, with increased emphasis on the social benefits that companies provide. This has enabled more sectors to tap into ESG financing and showcase their sustainability credentials. In August, for example, Burberry became the first luxury fashion firm to issue a sustainability bond. Part of the use of proceeds will be ensuring it procures cotton more sustainably.

As a result of the growing discussion about a “green” recovery from the coronavirus pandemic, we expect an increasing focus on the broader environmental and social risks and opportunities that companies are faced with, enabling new sectors to move to the forefront of ESG.

What’s more, the growth of sustainability-linked borrowing will enable capex and opex-driven sectors to tap into “sustainability-labelled” debt within the capital markets. All companies inherently manage ESG risk in one way or another, but some may be unable to assign their expenditures to specific green projects. Sustainability-linked debt helps bridge that gap, enabling many more companies and sectors to align their overall sustainability strategy with their treasury policy.

Sustainable finance began as a largely investment-grade concern. High-yield firms, it was felt, lacked the scale or inclination to focus on ESG-related issues. But we’ve seen some encouraging signals in 2020, from high-yield companies and investors alike, including:

  • Issuance of high-yield sustainability debt instruments by Suzano (sustainability-linked), Getlink (green), Volvo Car (green) and Nordex (green)
  • Launches of new high-yield ESG funds by Principal Global Investors Funds (Global High Yield Fund), M&G (Global High Yield ESG Bond Fund) and Lyxor (Euro High Yield Sustainable Exposure Fund)
  • Embedding of ESG ratings into high-yield transactions by Drax.

Some financial market industry groups have looked to go further, fundamentally reshaping the structure of the high-yield debt market. For example, in July, the Association for Financial Markets in Europe (AFME) launched a set of ESG guidelines for the European high-yield market[1]. Meanwhile, the European Leveraged Finance Association (ELFA) is looking to build buy and sell-side consensus around detailed ESG best practices, including sector-level ESG KPIs that should be incorporated in any high-yield bond offering.

In short, we expect ESG high yield to come of age in 2021, with ESG-specific questions likely to feature in the disclosure and diligence of most European sub-investment grade transactions by the end of the year. The breadth and depth of sustainability data for this asset class will also grow, with ESG data agencies catering to growing investor and regulatory demands in this respect. Finally, sustainable debt structures will start to emerge in all the major high-yield sectors including energy, debt repurchasers (buyers of distressed or underperforming debt) and telecoms.

[1] See

Year ahead 2021

This document has been prepared for information purposes only, does not constitute an analysis of all potentially material issues and is subject to change at any time without prior notice. NatWest Markets does not undertake to update you of such changes.  It is indicative only and is not binding. Other than as indicated, this document has been prepared on the basis of publicly available information believed to be reliable but no representation, warranty, undertaking or assurance of any kind, express or implied, is made as to the adequacy, accuracy, completeness or reasonableness of the information contained in this document, nor does NatWest Markets accept any obligation to any recipient to update or correct any information contained herein. Views expressed herein are not intended to be and should not be viewed as advice or as a personal recommendation. The views expressed herein may not be objective or independent of the interests of the authors or other NatWest Markets trading desks, who may be active participants in the markets, investments or strategies referred to in this document. NatWest Markets will not act and has not acted as your legal, tax, regulatory, accounting or investment adviser; nor does NatWest Markets owe any fiduciary duties to you in connection with this, and/or any related transaction and no reliance may be placed on NatWest Markets for investment advice or recommendations of any sort. You should make your own independent evaluation of the relevance and adequacy of the information contained in this document and any issues that are of concern to you.

This document does not constitute an offer to buy or sell, or a solicitation of an offer to buy or sell any investment, nor does it constitute an offer to provide any products or services that are capable of acceptance to form a contract. NatWest Markets and each of its respective affiliates accepts no liability whatsoever for any direct, indirect or consequential losses (in contract, tort or otherwise) arising from the use of this material or reliance on the information contained herein. However this shall not restrict, exclude or limit any duty or liability to any person under any applicable laws or regulations of any jurisdiction which may not be lawfully disclaimed.

NatWest Markets Plc. Incorporated and registered in Scotland No. 90312 with limited liability. Registered Office: 36 St Andrew Square, Edinburgh EH2 2YB. Authorised by the Prudential Regulation Authority and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority and Prudential Regulation Authority. NatWest Markets N.V. is incorporated with limited liability in the Netherlands, authorised and regulated by De Nederlandsche Bank and the Autoriteit Financiële Markten. It has its seat at Amsterdam, the Netherlands, and is registered in the Commercial Register under number 33002587. Registered Office: Claude Debussylaan 94, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. Branch Reg No. in England BR001029. NatWest Markets Plc is, in certain jurisdictions, an authorised agent of NatWest Markets N.V. and NatWest Markets N.V. is, in certain jurisdictions, an authorised agent of NatWest Markets Plc. NatWest Markets Securities Japan Limited [Kanto Financial Bureau (Kin-sho) No. 202] is authorised and regulated by the Japan Financial Services Agency. Securities business in the United States is conducted through NatWest Markets Securities Inc., a FINRA registered broker-dealer (, a SIPC member ( and a wholly owned indirect subsidiary of NatWest Markets Plc.

Copyright 2020 © NatWest Markets Plc. All rights reserved.